Ultra 9 288V vs i7-13700F

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-13700F
2023
16 cores / 24 threads, 65 Watt
24.54
+96%
Core Ultra 9 288V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 30 Watt
12.52

Core i7-13700F outperforms Core Ultra 9 288V by an impressive 96% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-13700F and Core Ultra 9 288V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking208623
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation57.16no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency35.7339.50
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$359no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-13700F and Core Ultra 9 288V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads248
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed5.2 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rateno data37 MHz
L1 cache80K (per core)192 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache30 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm3 nm
Die size257 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-13700F and Core Ultra 9 288V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1700Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-13700F and Core Ultra 9 288V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i7-13700F and Core Ultra 9 288V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-13700F and Core Ultra 9 288V are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-13700F and Core Ultra 9 288V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5600, DDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size192 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth89.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc 140V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-13700F and Core Ultra 9 288V.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.05.0
PCI Express lanes164

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-13700F 24.54
+96%
Ultra 9 288V 12.52

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-13700F 38974
+95.9%
Ultra 9 288V 19895

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.54 12.52
Recency 4 January 2023 24 September 2024
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 24 8
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 30 Watt

i7-13700F has a 96% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

Ultra 9 288V, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 116.7% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-13700F is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 9 288V in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-13700F is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 9 288V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-13700F and Core Ultra 9 288V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-13700F
Core i7-13700F
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
Core Ultra 9 288V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 506 votes

Rate Core i7-13700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 35 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 288V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-13700F or Core Ultra 9 288V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.