Ultra 7 265KF vs i7-13700E

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-13700E
2023
16 cores / 24 threads, 65 Watt
21.86
Core Ultra 7 265KF
2024
20 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
37.46
+71.4%

Core Ultra 7 265KF outperforms Core i7-13700E by an impressive 71% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-13700E and Core Ultra 7 265KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24082
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data99.21
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency31.6628.21
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$379

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-13700E and Core Ultra 7 265KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads2420
Base clock speed1.9 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz5.5 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache30 MB (shared)30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm3 nm
Die size257 mm2243 mm2
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-13700E and Core Ultra 7 265KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket17001851
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-13700E and Core Ultra 7 265KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX++

Security technologies

Core i7-13700E and Core Ultra 7 265KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-13700E and Core Ultra 7 265KF are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-13700E and Core Ultra 7 265KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 770N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-13700E and Core Ultra 7 265KF.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-13700E 21.86
Ultra 7 265KF 37.46
+71.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-13700E 34728
Ultra 7 265KF 59499
+71.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.86 37.46
Recency 4 January 2023 24 October 2024
Physical cores 16 20
Threads 24 20
Chip lithography 10 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 125 Watt

i7-13700E has 20% more threads, and 92.3% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265KF, on the other hand, has a 71.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 25% more physical cores, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 7 265KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-13700E in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-13700E and Core Ultra 7 265KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-13700E
Core i7-13700E
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF
Core Ultra 7 265KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 9 votes

Rate Core i7-13700E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 36 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-13700E or Core Ultra 7 265KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.