Core i5-9600K vs Core i7-13700

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core i7-13700
2023
16 cores / 24 threads
24.22
+251%

Core i7-13700 outperforms Core i5-9600K by a whopping 251% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-13700 and Core i5-9600K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking184928
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation65.6111.96
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Core i5
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-SCoffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)19 October 2018 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$384$262
Current price$347 (0.9x MSRP)$217 (0.8x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-13700 has 449% better value for money than i5-9600K.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-13700 and Core i5-9600K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads246
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed5.2 GHz4.6 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache30 MB (shared)9 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm14 nm
Die size257 mm2149 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-13700 and Core i5-9600K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1700FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-13700 and Core i5-9600K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPP++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
StatusLaunchedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core i7-13700 and Core i5-9600K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPXno data+
Identity Protectionno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-13700 and Core i5-9600K are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-13700 and Core i5-9600K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5600, DDR4-3200DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size192 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth89.6 GB/s41.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 770Intel UHD Graphics 630
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.6 GHz1.15 GHz
Execution Units32no data
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-13700 and Core i5-9600K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported43

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-13700 and Core i5-9600K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160 @ 60Hz4096 x 2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDP5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz4096 x 2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz4096 x 2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-13700 and Core i5-9600K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.54.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-13700 and Core i5-9600K.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.03.0
PCI Express lanes2016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-13700 24.22
+251%
i5-9600K 6.91

Core i7-13700 outperforms Core i5-9600K by 251% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-13700 37464
+251%
i5-9600K 10682

Core i7-13700 outperforms Core i5-9600K by 251% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-13700 2628
+54%
i5-9600K 1707

Core i7-13700 outperforms Core i5-9600K by 54% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-13700 14783
+130%
i5-9600K 6423

Core i7-13700 outperforms Core i5-9600K by 130% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i7-13700 10840
+50.5%
i5-9600K 7205

Core i7-13700 outperforms Core i5-9600K by 50% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-13700 82724
+144%
i5-9600K 33950

Core i7-13700 outperforms Core i5-9600K by 144% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-13700 17194
+56.7%
i5-9600K 10974

Core i7-13700 outperforms Core i5-9600K by 57% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i7-13700 2.5
+141%
i5-9600K 6.03

Core i5-9600K outperforms Core i7-13700 by 141% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i7-13700 50
+359%
i5-9600K 11

Core i7-13700 outperforms Core i5-9600K by 359% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i7-13700 3692
+237%
i5-9600K 1094

Core i7-13700 outperforms Core i5-9600K by 237% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i7-13700 285
+47.7%
i5-9600K 193

Core i7-13700 outperforms Core i5-9600K by 48% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i7-13700 3.5
+56.3%
i5-9600K 2.24

Core i7-13700 outperforms Core i5-9600K by 56% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-13700 22
+293%
i5-9600K 5.6

Core i7-13700 outperforms Core i5-9600K by 293% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-13700 12289
+108%
i5-9600K 5903

Core i7-13700 outperforms Core i5-9600K by 108% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-13700 393
+57.2%
i5-9600K 250

Core i7-13700 outperforms Core i5-9600K by 57% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-13700 224
+226%
i5-9600K 69

Core i7-13700 outperforms Core i5-9600K by 226% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.22 6.91
Integrated graphics card 6.13 3.08
Recency 4 January 2023 19 October 2018
Physical cores 16 6
Threads 24 6
Cost $384 $262
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 95 Watt

The Core i7-13700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-9600K in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-13700 and Core i5-9600K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-13700
Core i7-13700
Intel Core i5-9600K
Core i5-9600K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 305 votes

Rate Core i7-13700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1669 votes

Rate Core i5-9600K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-13700 or Core i5-9600K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.