Celeron N3010 vs i7-13700
Aggregate performance score
Core i7-13700 outperforms Celeron N3010 by a whopping 5814% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 303 | 3251 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 50.19 | 0.01 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Celeron |
| Power efficiency | 13.46 | 3.70 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
| Architecture codename | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Airmont (2016) |
| Release date | 4 January 2023 (2 years ago) | 10 January 2016 (9 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $384 | $107 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
i7-13700 has 501800% better value for money than Celeron N3010.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Core i7-13700 and Celeron N3010 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Performance-cores | 8 | no data |
| Efficient-cores | 8 | no data |
| Threads | 24 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 1.04 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.2 GHz | 2.24 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | IDI |
| L1 cache | 80K (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 30 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | Intel 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 257 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 90 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-13700 and Celeron N3010 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCBGA1170 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 4 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-13700 and Celeron N3010. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | - |
| TSX | + | - |
| Idle States | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
| SIPP | + | - |
| Smart Response | no data | - |
| GPIO | no data | + |
| Smart Connect | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | + | no data |
| HD Audio | no data | + |
| RST | no data | - |
| Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
Security technologies
Core i7-13700 and Celeron N3010 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | - |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Boot | no data | + |
| Identity Protection | - | + |
| OS Guard | + | - |
| Anti-Theft | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-13700 and Celeron N3010 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | - |
| VT-x | + | + |
| VT-i | no data | - |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-13700 and Celeron N3010. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 | DDR3L-1600 |
| Maximum memory size | 192 GB | 8 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | no data |
| Max video memory | no data | 8 GB |
| Quick Sync Video | + | + |
| Clear Video | no data | + |
| Clear Video HD | + | + |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.6 GHz | 600 MHz |
| Execution Units | 32 | 12 |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-13700 and Celeron N3010 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 4 | 3 |
| eDP | no data | + |
| DisplayPort | - | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-13700 and Celeron N3010 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz | no data |
| Max resolution over eDP | 5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz | no data |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core i7-13700 and Celeron N3010 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | 12 | + |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-13700 and Celeron N3010.
| PCIe version | 5.0 and 4.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 4 |
| USB revision | no data | 2.0/3.0 |
| Total number of SATA ports | no data | 2 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 5 |
| Integrated LAN | no data | - |
| UART | no data | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 20.70 | 0.35 |
| Recency | 4 January 2023 | 10 January 2016 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 2 |
| Threads | 24 | 2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 4 Watt |
i7-13700 has a 5814.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and 700% more physical cores and 1100% more threads.
Celeron N3010, on the other hand, has 1525% lower power consumption.
The Intel Core i7-13700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron N3010 in performance tests.
Note that Core i7-13700 is a desktop processor while Celeron N3010 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
