Ryzen 9 7950X vs Core i7-12700F

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-12700F
2022
12 cores / 20 threads, 65 Watt
19.81
Ryzen 9 7950X
2022
16 cores / 32 threads, 170 Watt
40.63
+105%

Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Core i7-12700F by a whopping 105% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-12700F and Ryzen 9 7950X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking26258
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation61.3462.74
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameAlder Lake-S (2022)Raphael (Zen 4)
Release date4 January 2022 (2 years ago)27 September 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$386no data
Current price$268 (0.7x MSRP)$701

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 9 7950X has 2% better value for money than i7-12700F.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-12700F and Ryzen 9 7950X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads2032
Base clock speed2.1 GHz4.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.9 GHz5.7 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache25 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm5 nm
Die size215 mm2CCD = 2x 70 sq. mm, I/O = 122 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data47 °C
Number of transistorsno data13140 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-12700F and Ryzen 9 7950X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1700AM5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt170 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-12700F and Ryzen 9 7950X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2CCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm, 0.650 - 1.475 V
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Core i7-12700F and Ryzen 9 7950X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-12700F and Ryzen 9 7950X are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-12700F and Ryzen 9 7950X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800, DDR4-3200DDR5-5200
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-12700F and Ryzen 9 7950X.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.05.0
PCI Express lanes2024

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-12700F 19.81
Ryzen 9 7950X 40.63
+105%

Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Core i7-12700F by 105% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-12700F 30638
Ryzen 9 7950X 62846
+105%

Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Core i7-12700F by 105% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-12700F 2372
Ryzen 9 7950X 2941
+24%

Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Core i7-12700F by 24% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-12700F 11593
Ryzen 9 7950X 19309
+66.6%

Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Core i7-12700F by 67% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i7-12700F 9146
+7.5%
Ryzen 9 7950X 8508

Core i7-12700F outperforms Ryzen 9 7950X by 7% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-12700F 56067
Ryzen 9 7950X 72480
+29.3%

Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Core i7-12700F by 29% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-12700F 15823
Ryzen 9 7950X 21065
+33.1%

Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Core i7-12700F by 33% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i7-12700F 2.95
Ryzen 9 7950X 1.67
+76.6%

Core i7-12700F outperforms Ryzen 9 7950X by 77% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i7-12700F 34
Ryzen 9 7950X 69
+105%

Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Core i7-12700F by 105% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i7-12700F 2610
Ryzen 9 7950X 6095
+134%

Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Core i7-12700F by 134% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i7-12700F 271
Ryzen 9 7950X 316
+16.6%

Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Core i7-12700F by 17% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i7-12700F 3.28
Ryzen 9 7950X 3.7
+12.8%

Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Core i7-12700F by 13% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-12700F 3.3
Ryzen 9 7950X 32.5
+885%

Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Core i7-12700F by 885% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-12700F 8695
Ryzen 9 7950X 15779
+81.5%

Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Core i7-12700F by 81% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-12700F 119
Ryzen 9 7950X 274
+131%

Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Core i7-12700F by 131% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-12700F 297
Ryzen 9 7950X 383
+29.2%

Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Core i7-12700F by 29% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.81 40.63
Recency 4 January 2022 27 September 2022
Physical cores 12 16
Threads 20 32
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 170 Watt

The Ryzen 9 7950X is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-12700F in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-12700F and Ryzen 9 7950X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-12700F
Core i7-12700F
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
Ryzen 9 7950X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1279 votes

Rate Core i7-12700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1375 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 7950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-12700F or Ryzen 9 7950X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.