Ryzen 7 7735HS vs Core i7-12700F

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-12700F
2022
12 cores / 20 threads, 65 Watt
19.82
+26.7%

Core i7-12700F outperforms Ryzen 7 7735HS by a significant 27% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-12700F and Ryzen 7 7735HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking254396
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation61.45no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Architecture codenameAlder Lake-S (2022)Rembrandt-HS Refresh
Release date4 January 2022 (2 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$386no data
Current price$280 (0.7x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-12700F and Ryzen 7 7735HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2016
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.9 GHz4.75 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache25 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm6 nm
Die size215 mm2208 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-12700F and Ryzen 7 7735HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1700FP7
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-12700F and Ryzen 7 7735HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-6400 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Core i7-12700F and Ryzen 7 7735HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-12700F and Ryzen 7 7735HS are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-12700F and Ryzen 7 7735HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800, DDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 680M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-12700F and Ryzen 7 7735HS.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.04.0
PCI Express lanes2020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-12700F 19.82
+26.7%
Ryzen 7 7735HS 15.64

Core i7-12700F outperforms Ryzen 7 7735HS by 27% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-12700F 30651
+26.7%
Ryzen 7 7735HS 24199

Core i7-12700F outperforms Ryzen 7 7735HS by 27% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-12700F 2371
+20.9%
Ryzen 7 7735HS 1961

Core i7-12700F outperforms Ryzen 7 7735HS by 21% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-12700F 11592
+25.1%
Ryzen 7 7735HS 9263

Core i7-12700F outperforms Ryzen 7 7735HS by 25% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i7-12700F 9146
+38.1%
Ryzen 7 7735HS 6625

Core i7-12700F outperforms Ryzen 7 7735HS by 38% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-12700F 56067
+36.8%
Ryzen 7 7735HS 40977

Core i7-12700F outperforms Ryzen 7 7735HS by 37% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-12700F 15823
+18.3%
Ryzen 7 7735HS 13372

Core i7-12700F outperforms Ryzen 7 7735HS by 18% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i7-12700F 2.95
+20%
Ryzen 7 7735HS 3.54

Ryzen 7 7735HS outperforms Core i7-12700F by 20% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i7-12700F 34
+31.5%
Ryzen 7 7735HS 25

Core i7-12700F outperforms Ryzen 7 7735HS by 32% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i7-12700F 2610
+19.5%
Ryzen 7 7735HS 2184

Core i7-12700F outperforms Ryzen 7 7735HS by 19% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i7-12700F 271
+9.3%
Ryzen 7 7735HS 248

Core i7-12700F outperforms Ryzen 7 7735HS by 9% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i7-12700F 3.28
+11.6%
Ryzen 7 7735HS 2.94

Core i7-12700F outperforms Ryzen 7 7735HS by 12% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-12700F 3.3
Ryzen 7 7735HS 12.8
+286%

Ryzen 7 7735HS outperforms Core i7-12700F by 286% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-12700F 8695
+34.2%
Ryzen 7 7735HS 6478

Core i7-12700F outperforms Ryzen 7 7735HS by 34% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-12700F 119
Ryzen 7 7735HS 125
+5.5%

Ryzen 7 7735HS outperforms Core i7-12700F by 6% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-12700F 297
+9.7%
Ryzen 7 7735HS 270

Core i7-12700F outperforms Ryzen 7 7735HS by 10% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.82 15.64
Recency 4 January 2022 4 January 2023
Physical cores 12 8
Threads 20 16
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

The Core i7-12700F is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 7735HS in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-12700F is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 7735HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-12700F and Ryzen 7 7735HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-12700F
Core i7-12700F
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
Ryzen 7 7735HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1243 votes

Rate Core i7-12700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1108 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7735HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-12700F or Ryzen 7 7735HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.