Core i9-13980HX vs Core i7-1185G7

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core i7-1185G7
2020
4 cores / 8 threads
6.76

Core i9-13980HX outperforms Core i7-1185G7 by a whopping 353% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-1185G7 and Core i9-13980HX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking939118
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Tiger LakeIntel Raptor Lake-HX
Architecture codenameTiger Lake-UP3Raptor Lake-HX
Release date2 September 2020 (3 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Core i7-1185G7 and Core i9-13980HX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads832
Base clock speed3 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz5.5 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm SuperFinIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-1185G7 and Core i9-13980HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1449FCBGA1964
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-1185G7 and Core i9-13980HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPP+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
StatusLaunchedLaunched

Security technologies

Core i7-1185G7 and Core i9-13980HX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
Secure Keyno data+
SGX-no data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-1185G7 and Core i9-13980HX are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-1185G7 and Core i9-13980HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size64 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data89.6 GB/s
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® Iris® Xe GraphicsIntel® UHD Graphics for 13th Gen Intel® Processors
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.35 GHz1.65 GHz
Execution Units9632

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-1185G7 and Core i9-13980HX integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported44

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-1185G7 and Core i9-13980HX integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@60Hz4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hz5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680x4320@60Hz7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-1185G7 and Core i9-13980HX integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.112.1
OpenGL4.64.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-1185G7 and Core i9-13980HX.

PCIe version4.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-1185G7 6.76
i9-13980HX 30.63
+353%

Core i9-13980HX outperforms Core i7-1185G7 by 353% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-1185G7 10460
i9-13980HX 47378
+353%

Core i9-13980HX outperforms Core i7-1185G7 by 353% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i7-1185G7 8872
i9-13980HX 11940
+34.6%

Core i9-13980HX outperforms Core i7-1185G7 by 35% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-1185G7 27025
i9-13980HX 85088
+215%

Core i9-13980HX outperforms Core i7-1185G7 by 215% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-1185G7 9108
i9-13980HX 19734
+117%

Core i9-13980HX outperforms Core i7-1185G7 by 117% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i7-1185G7 5.78
i9-13980HX 3.02
+91.4%

Core i7-1185G7 outperforms Core i9-13980HX by 91% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i7-1185G7 9
i9-13980HX 56
+498%

Core i9-13980HX outperforms Core i7-1185G7 by 498% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i7-1185G7 866
i9-13980HX 4717
+445%

Core i9-13980HX outperforms Core i7-1185G7 by 445% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i7-1185G7 217
i9-13980HX 305
+40.3%

Core i9-13980HX outperforms Core i7-1185G7 by 40% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i7-1185G7 2.54
i9-13980HX 3.73
+46.9%

Core i9-13980HX outperforms Core i7-1185G7 by 47% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-1185G7 5.8
i9-13980HX 18.4
+217%

Core i9-13980HX outperforms Core i7-1185G7 by 217% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-1185G7 6045
i9-13980HX 11438
+89.2%

Core i9-13980HX outperforms Core i7-1185G7 by 89% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-1185G7 199
i9-13980HX 374
+88.1%

Core i9-13980HX outperforms Core i7-1185G7 by 88% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-1185G7 47
i9-13980HX 198
+325%

Core i9-13980HX outperforms Core i7-1185G7 by 325% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.76 30.63
Recency 2 September 2020 4 January 2023
Physical cores 4 24
Threads 8 32
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 55 Watt

The Core i9-13980HX is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-1185G7 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-1185G7 and Core i9-13980HX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-1185G7
Core i7-1185G7
Intel Core i9-13980HX
Core i9-13980HX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 236 votes

Rate Core i7-1185G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 352 votes

Rate Core i9-13980HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-1185G7 or Core i9-13980HX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.