Ultra 9 285K vs i7-1160G7

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-1160G7
2020
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
5.78
Core Ultra 9 285K
2024
24 cores / 24 threads, 125 Watt
43.26
+648%

Core Ultra 9 285K outperforms Core i7-1160G7 by a whopping 648% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-1160G7 and Core Ultra 9 285K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking112050
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data70.82
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Tiger Lakeno data
Power efficiency36.4732.75
Architecture codenameTiger Lake-UP4 (2020)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date2 September 2020 (4 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$589

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-1160G7 and Core Ultra 9 285K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads824
Base clock speed1.2 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz5.7 GHz
Bus rate2 GT/s250 MHz
L1 cache96K (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm SuperFin3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-1160G7 and Core Ultra 9 285K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA15981851
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-1160G7 and Core Ultra 9 285K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i7-1160G7 and Core Ultra 9 285K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-1160G7 and Core Ultra 9 285K are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-1160G7 and Core Ultra 9 285K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5 Depends on motherboard
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® Iris® Xe GraphicsArc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data
Execution Units96no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-1160G7 and Core Ultra 9 285K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-1160G7 and Core Ultra 9 285K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680x4320@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-1160G7 and Core Ultra 9 285K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-1160G7 and Core Ultra 9 285K.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-1160G7 5.78
Ultra 9 285K 43.26
+648%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-1160G7 9181
Ultra 9 285K 68723
+649%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i7-1160G7 4917
Ultra 9 285K 25963
+428%

Blender(-)

i7-1160G7 911
+1053%
Ultra 9 285K 79

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

i7-1160G7 1437
Ultra 9 285K 2388
+66.1%

7-Zip Single

i7-1160G7 4596
Ultra 9 285K 7366
+60.3%

7-Zip

i7-1160G7 17006
Ultra 9 285K 129706
+663%

WebXPRT 3

i7-1160G7 232
Ultra 9 285K 387
+67.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.78 43.26
Recency 2 September 2020 24 October 2024
Physical cores 4 24
Threads 8 24
Chip lithography 10 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 125 Watt

i7-1160G7 has 733.3% lower power consumption.

Ultra 9 285K, on the other hand, has a 648.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 500% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 9 285K is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-1160G7 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-1160G7 is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 9 285K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-1160G7 and Core Ultra 9 285K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-1160G7
Core i7-1160G7
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Core Ultra 9 285K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 35 votes

Rate Core i7-1160G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 112 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-1160G7 or Core Ultra 9 285K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.