Ultra 9 285K vs i7-11375H

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-11375H
2021
4 cores / 8 threads, 28 Watt
7.45
Core Ultra 9 285K
2024
24 cores / 24 threads, 125 Watt
42.98
+477%

Core Ultra 9 285K outperforms Core i7-11375H by a whopping 477% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-11375H and Core Ultra 9 285K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking97954
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data74.24
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Power efficiency25.1832.54
Architecture codenameTiger Lake-H35 (2021)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date11 January 2021 (3 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$482$589

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-11375H and Core Ultra 9 285K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Performance-coresno data8
Efficient-coresno data16
Threads824
Base clock speed3 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz5.6 GHz
Bus rate4 GT/s250 MHz
L1 cache80K (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm SuperFin3 nm
Die size146.1 mm2243 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-11375H and Core Ultra 9 285K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1449,FCLGA1449FCLGA1851
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-11375H and Core Ultra 9 285K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0++
Deep Learning Boost++
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

Core i7-11375H and Core Ultra 9 285K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
SGX-no data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-11375H and Core Ultra 9 285K are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-11375H and Core Ultra 9 285K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-6400
Maximum memory size64 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® Iris® Xe GraphicsIntel® Graphics
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency1.35 GHz2 GHz
Execution Units96no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-11375H and Core Ultra 9 285K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported44

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-11375H and Core Ultra 9 285K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@60Hz4K @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 8K @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hz4K @ 60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680x4320@60Hz8K @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-11375H and Core Ultra 9 285K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.112
OpenGL4.64.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-11375H and Core Ultra 9 285K.

PCIe version4.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes2020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-11375H 7.45
Ultra 9 285K 42.98
+477%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-11375H 11829
Ultra 9 285K 68271
+477%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i7-11375H 6098
Ultra 9 285K 25963
+326%

Blender(-)

i7-11375H 473
+499%
Ultra 9 285K 79

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

i7-11375H 1648
Ultra 9 285K 2388
+44.9%

7-Zip Single

i7-11375H 5565
Ultra 9 285K 7366
+32.4%

7-Zip

i7-11375H 28441
Ultra 9 285K 129706
+356%

WebXPRT 3

i7-11375H 249
Ultra 9 285K 387
+55.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.45 42.98
Recency 11 January 2021 24 October 2024
Physical cores 4 24
Threads 8 24
Chip lithography 10 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 125 Watt

i7-11375H has 346.4% lower power consumption.

Ultra 9 285K, on the other hand, has a 476.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 500% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 9 285K is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-11375H in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-11375H is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 9 285K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-11375H and Core Ultra 9 285K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-11375H
Core i7-11375H
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Core Ultra 9 285K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 44 votes

Rate Core i7-11375H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 174 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-11375H or Core Ultra 9 285K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.