i9-12900HK vs i7-10750H

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-10750H
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 45 Watt
7.44
Core i9-12900HK
2022
14 cores / 20 threads, 45 Watt
17.15
+131%

Core i9-12900HK outperforms Core i7-10750H by a whopping 131% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-10750H and Core i9-12900HK processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking980376
Place by popularity79not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Alder Lake-P
Power efficiency15.6636.09
Architecture codenameComet Lake-H (2020)Alder Lake-H (2022)
Release date2 April 2020 (4 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$435no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-10750H and Core i9-12900HK basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads1220
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz5 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data217 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-10750H and Core i9-12900HK compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1440FCBGA1744
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-10750H and Core i9-12900HK. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0++
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i7-10750H and Core i9-12900HK technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-10750H and Core i9-12900HK are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-10750H and Core i9-12900HK. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth45.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel ProcessorsIntel® Iris® Xe Graphics eligible
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHz1.45 GHz
Execution Unitsno data96

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-10750H and Core i9-12900HK integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-10750H and Core i9-12900HK integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304@30Hz4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304@60Hz4096 x 2304 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096 x 2304@60Hz7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-10750H and Core i9-12900HK integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212.1
OpenGL4.54.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-10750H and Core i9-12900HK.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-10750H 7.44
i9-12900HK 17.15
+131%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-10750H 11820
i9-12900HK 27240
+130%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i7-10750H 7377
i9-12900HK 9397
+27.4%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i7-10750H 37154
i9-12900HK 49924
+34.4%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i7-10750H 11307
i9-12900HK 15598
+37.9%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i7-10750H 5.56
i9-12900HK 3.41
+63%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i7-10750H 14
i9-12900HK 27
+95.8%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i7-10750H 1304
i9-12900HK 2836
+118%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i7-10750H 197
i9-12900HK 270
+37.1%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

i7-10750H 2.2
i9-12900HK 3.26
+48.2%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

i7-10750H 7.6
i9-12900HK 14.1
+85.5%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

i7-10750H 6287
i9-12900HK 8735
+38.9%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

i7-10750H 78
i9-12900HK 125
+59.7%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

i7-10750H 221
i9-12900HK 300
+35.8%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i7-10750H 6308
i9-12900HK 13683
+117%

Blender(-)

i7-10750H 371
+105%
i9-12900HK 181

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

i7-10750H 1270
i9-12900HK 1868
+47.1%

7-Zip Single

i7-10750H 5120
i9-12900HK 5803
+13.3%

7-Zip

i7-10750H 35346
i9-12900HK 72836
+106%

WebXPRT 3

i7-10750H 225
i9-12900HK 300
+33.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.44 17.15
Recency 2 April 2020 4 January 2022
Physical cores 6 14
Threads 12 20

i9-12900HK has a 130.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 133.3% more physical cores and 66.7% more threads.

The Core i9-12900HK is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-10750H in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-10750H and Core i9-12900HK, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-10750H
Core i7-10750H
Intel Core i9-12900HK
Core i9-12900HK

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2174 votes

Rate Core i7-10750H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 70 votes

Rate Core i9-12900HK on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-10750H or Core i9-12900HK, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.