Celeron 3215U vs i7-10750H

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-10750H
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 45 Watt
6.59
+946%

Core i7-10750H outperforms Celeron 3215U by a whopping 946% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11732970
Place by popularity98not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.120.05
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Celeron
Power efficiency6.191.78
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameComet Lake-H (2020)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date2 April 2020 (5 years ago)1 June 2015 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$435$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-10750H has 12140% better value for money than Celeron 3215U.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core i7-10750H and Celeron 3215U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed2.6 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz1.7 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/s5 GT/s
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)512 KB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data82 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1300 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-10750H and Celeron 3215U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1440FCBGA1168
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-10750H and Celeron 3215U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
Smart Responseno data-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Core i7-10750H and Celeron 3215U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-10750H and Celeron 3215U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-10750H and Celeron 3215U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size128 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth45.8 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel ProcessorsIntel HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel Processors
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Videono data+
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHz850 MHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-10750H and Celeron 3215U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-10750H and Celeron 3215U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304@30Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096 x 2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-10750H and Celeron 3215U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1211.2/12
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-10750H and Celeron 3215U.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes1612

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

i7-10750H 6.59
+946%
Celeron 3215U 0.63

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

i7-10750H 11577
+951%
Samples: 9307
Celeron 3215U 1102
Samples: 65

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-10750H 1455
+341%
Celeron 3215U 330

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-10750H 5378
+826%
Celeron 3215U 581

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.59 0.63
Integrated graphics card 4.86 0.68
Recency 2 April 2020 1 June 2015
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 15 Watt

i7-10750H has a 946% higher aggregate performance score, 614.7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 years, and 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

Celeron 3215U, on the other hand, has 200% lower power consumption.

The Intel Core i7-10750H is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron 3215U in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-10750H
Core i7-10750H
Intel Celeron 3215U
Celeron 3215U

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2334 votes

Rate Core i7-10750H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 28 votes

Rate Celeron 3215U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core i7-10750H and Celeron 3215U, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.