Xeon Gold 6416H vs i7-10700F

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-10700F
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
9.20
Xeon Gold 6416H
2023, $1,444
18 cores / 36 threads, 165 Watt
23.20
+152%

Xeon Gold 6416H outperforms Core i7-10700F by a whopping 152% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking999293
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data15.35
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency3.115.93
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameComet Lake (2020−2025)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date30 April 2020 (5 years ago)10 January 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,444

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core i7-10700F and Xeon Gold 6416H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)18 (Octadeca-Core)
Threads1636
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)45 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C82 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-10700F and Xeon Gold 6416H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration14
SocketFCLGA1200FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-10700F and Xeon Gold 6416H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i7-10700F and Xeon Gold 6416H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-10700F and Xeon Gold 6416H are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-10700F and Xeon Gold 6416H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400
Maximum memory size128 GB4 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth45.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-10700F and Xeon Gold 6416H.

PCIe version3.05
PCI Express lanes1680

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

i7-10700F 9.20
Xeon Gold 6416H 23.20
+152%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

i7-10700F 16096
Samples: 2856
Xeon Gold 6416H 40606
+152%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.20 23.20
Recency 30 April 2020 10 January 2023
Physical cores 8 18
Threads 16 36
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 165 Watt

i7-10700F has 154% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6416H, on the other hand, has a 152% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and 125% more physical cores and 125% more threads.

The Intel Xeon Gold 6416H is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core i7-10700F in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-10700F is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 6416H is a server/workstation one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1275 votes

Rate Core i7-10700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 6416H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core i7-10700F and Xeon Gold 6416H, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.