Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX vs Core i7-10700F

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-10700F
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
10.62
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
2022
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
48.94
+361%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX outperforms i7-10700F by a whopping 361% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-10700F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking68432
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation29.2521.76
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen Threadripper
Architecture codenameComet Lake (2020)Chagall PRO (2022)
Release date30 April 2020 (4 years ago)8 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Current price$210 $2220

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-10700F has 34% better value for money than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-10700F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads1664
Base clock speed2.9 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz4.5 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)128 MB
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data4x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C95 °C
Number of transistorsno data16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-10700F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1200WRX8
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-10700F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
SIPP-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i7-10700F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-10700F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-10700F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size128 GB2 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth45.8 GB/s204.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-10700F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-10700F 10.62
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 48.94
+361%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX outperforms Core i7-10700F by 361% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-10700F 16424
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 75703
+361%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX outperforms Core i7-10700F by 361% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-10700F 1618
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 2019
+24.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX outperforms Core i7-10700F by 25% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-10700F 7261
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 16443
+126%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX outperforms Core i7-10700F by 126% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.62 48.94
Recency 30 April 2020 8 March 2022
Physical cores 8 32
Threads 16 64
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 280 Watt

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-10700F in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-10700F is a desktop processor while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-10700F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-10700F
Core i7-10700F
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1017 votes

Rate Core i7-10700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 32 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-10700F or Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.