Celeron B810E vs i7-1068G7
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1416 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core i7 | Intel Celeron |
| Power efficiency | 18.32 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
| Architecture codename | Ice Lake (Client) (2019) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| Release date | 1 August 2019 (6 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $72 |
Detailed specifications
Core i7-1068G7 and Celeron B810E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 8 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.3 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.1 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus type | OPI | DMI 2.0 |
| Bus rate | 4 × 4 GT/s | 4 × 5 GT/s |
| Multiplier | 23 | 16 |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 131 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 504 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-1068G7 and Celeron B810E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | Intel BGA1440 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-1068G7 and Celeron B810E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-1068G7 and Celeron B810E are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-1068G7 and Celeron B810E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR3-1333 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 16 GB |
| Max memory channels | 4 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 59.732 GB/s | 21.335 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (300 - 1100 MHz) | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 5.00 | 0.33 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 8 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 35 Watt |
i7-1068G7 has 1415.2% faster integrated GPU, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Core i7-1068G7 and Intel Celeron B810E. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
