Ryzen 3 5300U vs i7-1065G7

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-1065G7
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
5.21
Ryzen 3 5300U
2021
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
6.10
+17.1%

Ryzen 3 5300U outperforms Core i7-1065G7 by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-1065G7 and Ryzen 3 5300U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11861084
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7AMD Lucienne (Zen 2, Ryzen 5000)
Power efficiency19.7238.49
Architecture codenameIce Lake (Client) (2019)Lucienne-U (Zen 2) (2021)
Release date1 August 2019 (5 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$426no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-1065G7 and Ryzen 3 5300U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed1.3 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus typeOPIno data
Bus rate4 × 4 GT/sno data
Multiplier1326
L1 cache320 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data156 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data9,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-1065G7 and Ryzen 3 5300U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1526FP6
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-1065G7 and Ryzen 3 5300U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i7-1065G7 and Ryzen 3 5300U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-1065G7 and Ryzen 3 5300U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-1065G7 and Ryzen 3 5300U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GB64 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth59.732 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel Iris Plus GraphicsAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1500 MHz)
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-1065G7 and Ryzen 3 5300U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-1065G7 and Ryzen 3 5300U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP5120 x 3200@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort5120 x 3200@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-1065G7 and Ryzen 3 5300U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-1065G7 and Ryzen 3 5300U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-1065G7 5.21
Ryzen 3 5300U 6.10
+17.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-1065G7 8275
Ryzen 3 5300U 9693
+17.1%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i7-1065G7 7271
+42.1%
Ryzen 3 5300U 5118

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i7-1065G7 22402
+1.2%
Ryzen 3 5300U 22139

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i7-1065G7 9209
+16.1%
Ryzen 3 5300U 7931

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i7-1065G7 7
Ryzen 3 5300U 9
+28.7%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i7-1065G7 663
Ryzen 3 5300U 906
+36.8%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i7-1065G7 178
+4.8%
Ryzen 3 5300U 170

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

i7-1065G7 2.11
+11.6%
Ryzen 3 5300U 1.89

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

i7-1065G7 5
Ryzen 3 5300U 5.1
+2%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

i7-1065G7 4956
+94.3%
Ryzen 3 5300U 2551

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i7-1065G7 4407
+9.9%
Ryzen 3 5300U 4008

Blender(-)

i7-1065G7 836
+53.7%
Ryzen 3 5300U 544

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

i7-1065G7 1316
+23%
Ryzen 3 5300U 1070

7-Zip Single

i7-1065G7 4393
+10.9%
Ryzen 3 5300U 3960

7-Zip

i7-1065G7 17255
Ryzen 3 5300U 21971
+27.3%

WebXPRT 3

i7-1065G7 202
+7.5%
Ryzen 3 5300U 187

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

i7-1065G7 14396
Ryzen 3 5300U 16771
+16.5%

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

i7-1065G7 3863
Ryzen 3 5300U 4096
+6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.21 6.10
Integrated graphics card 4.70 6.03
Recency 1 August 2019 12 January 2021
Chip lithography 10 nm 7 nm

Ryzen 3 5300U has a 17.1% higher aggregate performance score, 28.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 3 5300U is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-1065G7 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-1065G7 and Ryzen 3 5300U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-1065G7
Core i7-1065G7
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
Ryzen 3 5300U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 713 votes

Rate Core i7-1065G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1972 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 5300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-1065G7 or Ryzen 3 5300U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.