N200 vs Core i5-L16G7
Aggregate performance score
N200 outperforms i5-L16G7 by a considerable 49% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-L16G7 and N200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1798 | 1549 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Ice Lake | no data |
| Architecture codename | Lakefield (2020) | no data |
| Release date | June 2020 (4 years ago) | 1 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $281 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core i5-L16G7 and N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 5 (Penta-Core) | no data |
| Threads | 5 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 1.4 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 80 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | no data |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | no data |
| Die size | 82 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 4,050 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-L16G7 and N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | CSP1016 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-L16G7 and N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-L16G7 and N200 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-L16G7 and N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | unknown | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 34 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | - | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-L16G7 and N200.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 6 | 9 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.22 | 3.31 |
| Threads | 5 | 4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7 Watt | 6 Watt |
i5-L16G7 has 25% more threads.
N200, on the other hand, has a 49.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 16.7% lower power consumption.
The N200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-L16G7 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-L16G7 and N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
