i5-12400F vs i5-L16G7

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-L16G7
2020
5 cores / 5 threads, 7 Watt
2.13
Core i5-12400F
2022
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
12.29
+477%

Core i5-12400F outperforms Core i5-L16G7 by a whopping 477% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-L16G7 and Core i5-12400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1870631
Place by popularitynot in top-1002
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data46.19
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Ice Lakeno data
Power efficiency28.8017.89
Architecture codenameLakefield (2020)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release dateJune 2020 (4 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$281$180

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-L16G7 and Core i5-12400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores5 (Penta-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads512
Base clock speed1.4 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz4.4 GHz
Bus rate4 GT/sno data
L1 cache80 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)18 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size82 mm2163 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors4,050 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-L16G7 and Core i5-12400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFC-CSP1016FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-L16G7 and Core i5-12400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i5-L16G7 and Core i5-12400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key++
SGX-no data
OS Guard++
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-L16G7 and Core i5-12400F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-L16G7 and Core i5-12400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesLPDDR4X-4267DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size8 GB128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidth34 GB/s76.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphicsno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency500 MHzno data
Execution Units64no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-L16G7 and Core i5-12400F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-L16G7 and Core i5-12400F integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-L16G7 and Core i5-12400F integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDX12no data
OpenGLOpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-L16G7 and Core i5-12400F.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-L16G7 2.13
i5-12400F 12.29
+477%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-L16G7 3386
i5-12400F 19521
+477%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i5-L16G7 603
i5-12400F 2219
+268%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i5-L16G7 1193
i5-12400F 9101
+663%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i5-L16G7 4079
i5-12400F 8389
+106%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i5-L16G7 9003
i5-12400F 40690
+352%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i5-L16G7 28.6
i5-12400F 4.08
+601%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i5-L16G7 3
i5-12400F 20
+541%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i5-L16G7 255
i5-12400F 1759
+590%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i5-L16G7 90
i5-12400F 244
+173%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

i5-L16G7 1.42
i5-12400F 2.95
+108%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i5-L16G7 1634
i5-12400F 9517
+483%

Blender(-)

i5-L16G7 2027
+653%
i5-12400F 269

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

i5-L16G7 827
i5-12400F 1742
+111%

7-Zip Single

i5-L16G7 3211
i5-12400F 5476
+70.5%

7-Zip

i5-L16G7 7587
i5-12400F 45043
+494%

WebXPRT 3

i5-L16G7 125
i5-12400F 272
+118%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.13 12.29
Physical cores 5 6
Threads 5 12
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 65 Watt

i5-L16G7 has 828.6% lower power consumption.

i5-12400F, on the other hand, has a 477% higher aggregate performance score, and 20% more physical cores and 140% more threads.

The Core i5-12400F is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-L16G7 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i5-L16G7 is a notebook processor while Core i5-12400F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-L16G7 and Core i5-12400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-L16G7
Core i5-L16G7
Intel Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 23 votes

Rate Core i5-L16G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 13946 votes

Rate Core i5-12400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-L16G7 or Core i5-12400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.