Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 vs i5-9500T
Aggregate performance score
Core i5-9500T outperforms Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 by a whopping 1002% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-9500T and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1191 | 2908 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 5.24 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core i5 | 2x AMD Turion Ultra |
| Power efficiency | 14.01 | 1.39 |
| Architecture codename | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) | Puma (2008−2009) |
| Release date | 1 April 2018 (6 years ago) | 3 June 2008 (16 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $192 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i5-9500T and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 6 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 3.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | 3600 MHz |
| Multiplier | 22 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 9 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 149 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-9500T and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA1151 | S1g2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 32 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-9500T and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| PowerNow | - | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| SIPP | + | - |
Security technologies
Core i5-9500T and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
| Secure Key | + | no data |
| MPX | + | - |
| Identity Protection | + | - |
| SGX | Yes with Intel® ME | no data |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-9500T and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-9500T and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR2 |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 42.671 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | no data |
| Max video memory | 64 GB | no data |
| Quick Sync Video | + | - |
| Clear Video | + | no data |
| Clear Video HD | + | no data |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.1 GHz | no data |
| InTru 3D | + | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-9500T and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-9500T and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| 4K resolution support | + | no data |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096 x 2304@24Hz | no data |
| Max resolution over eDP | 4096 x 2304@60Hz | no data |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096 x 2304@60Hz | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core i5-9500T and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | 12 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-9500T and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 5.18 | 0.47 |
| Recency | 1 April 2018 | 3 June 2008 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 2 |
| Threads | 6 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 32 Watt |
i5-9500T has a 1002.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80, on the other hand, has 9.4% lower power consumption.
The Core i5-9500T is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 in performance tests.
Note that Core i5-9500T is a desktop processor while Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-9500T and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
