Xeon W-11855M vs Core i5-9400F

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-9400F
2019
6 cores / 6 threads, 65 Watt
6.12
Xeon W-11855M
2021
6 cores / 12 threads, 35 Watt
11.74
+91.8%

Xeon W-11855M outperforms i5-9400F by an impressive 92% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-9400F and Xeon W-11855M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1021622
Place by popularity29not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.6550.13
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i5Intel Tiger Lake
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-R (2018−2019)Tiger Lake-H (2021)
Release date8 January 2019 (5 years ago)11 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$182no data
Current price$127 (0.7x MSRP)$333

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-11855M has 184% better value for money than i5-9400F.

Detailed specifications

Core i5-9400F and Xeon W-11855M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads612
Base clock speed2.9 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache9 MB (shared)18 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm SuperFin
Die size149 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-9400F and Xeon W-11855M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1151FCBGA1787
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-9400F and Xeon W-11855M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core i5-9400F and Xeon W-11855M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data
Secure Key++
MPX+no data
Identity Protection+no data
SGXYes with Intel® ME-
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-9400F and Xeon W-11855M are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-9400F and Xeon W-11855M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4
Maximum memory size128 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth41.6 GB/s51.2 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel® Processors
Quick Sync Videono data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.45 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-9400F and Xeon W-11855M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-9400F and Xeon W-11855M integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680x4320@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-9400F and Xeon W-11855M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-9400F and Xeon W-11855M.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-9400F 6.12
Xeon W-11855M 11.74
+91.8%

Xeon W-11855M outperforms Core i5-9400F by 92% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i5-9400F 9471
Xeon W-11855M 18158
+91.7%

Xeon W-11855M outperforms Core i5-9400F by 92% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i5-9400F 1382
Xeon W-11855M 1996
+44.4%

Xeon W-11855M outperforms Core i5-9400F by 44% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i5-9400F 4835
Xeon W-11855M 7305
+51.1%

Xeon W-11855M outperforms Core i5-9400F by 51% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.12 11.74
Recency 8 January 2019 11 May 2021
Threads 6 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

The Xeon W-11855M is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-9400F in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-9400F is a desktop processor while Xeon W-11855M is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-9400F and Xeon W-11855M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-9400F
Core i5-9400F
Intel Xeon W-11855M
Xeon W-11855M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 56203 votes

Rate Core i5-9400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 23 votes

Rate Xeon W-11855M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-9400F or Xeon W-11855M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.