Celeron T3100 vs Core i5-9400F

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-9400F and Celeron T3100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking995not rated
Place by popularity26not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.43no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i5no data
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-R (2018−2019)no data
Release date8 January 2019 (5 years ago)1 July 2008 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$182no data
Current price$138 (0.8x MSRP)$32

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-9400F and Celeron T3100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)no data
Threads6no data
Base clock speed2.9 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHzno data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)no data
L3 cache9 MB (shared)1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die size149 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage rangeno data1V-1.25V

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-9400F and Celeron T3100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1151BGA479,PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-9400F and Celeron T3100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology--
TSX-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
SIPP-no data
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core i5-9400F and Celeron T3100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+no data
Identity Protection+no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-9400F and Celeron T3100 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-9400F and Celeron T3100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666no data
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth41.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-9400F and Celeron T3100.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i5-9400F 9470
+1481%
Celeron T3100 599

Core i5-9400F outperforms Celeron T3100 by 1481% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i5-9400F 1380
+545%
Celeron T3100 214

Core i5-9400F outperforms Celeron T3100 by 545% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i5-9400F 4828
+1223%
Celeron T3100 365

Core i5-9400F outperforms Celeron T3100 by 1223% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 January 2019 1 July 2008
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

We couldn't decide between Core i5-9400F and Celeron T3100. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core i5-9400F is a desktop processor while Celeron T3100 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-9400F and Celeron T3100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-9400F
Core i5-9400F
Intel Celeron T3100
Celeron T3100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 55979 votes

Rate Core i5-9400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 18 votes

Rate Celeron T3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-9400F or Celeron T3100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.