Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U vs Core i5-9300H

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-9300H
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
4.91
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
2021
6 cores / 12 threads, 15 Watt
9.65
+96.5%

Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U outperforms Core i5-9300H by an impressive 97% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-9300H and Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1167744
Place by popularity73not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i5Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-H (2018−2019)Cezanne-U PRO (Zen 3)
Release date30 April 2019 (5 years ago)16 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$250no data
Current price$861 (3.4x MSRP)no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-9300H and Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads812
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz4.2 GHz
L1 cache256 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die size149 mm2180 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistorsno data10,700 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-9300H and Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1440FP6
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-9300H and Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2DDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, PRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i5-9300H and Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+no data
Identity Protection+no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-9300H and Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-9300H and Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth41.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 630AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-9300H and Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-9300H and Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304@30Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096 x 2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-9300H and Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-9300H and Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes168

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-9300H 4.91
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U 9.65
+96.5%

Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U outperforms Core i5-9300H by 97% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i5-9300H 7597
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U 14921
+96.4%

Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U outperforms Core i5-9300H by 96% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i5-9300H 1273
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U 1593
+25.1%

Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U outperforms Core i5-9300H by 25% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i5-9300H 3679
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U 5488
+49.2%

Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U outperforms Core i5-9300H by 49% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i5-9300H 6572
+293293%
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U 2

Core i5-9300H outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U by 293293% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i5-9300H 24623
+197358%
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U 12

Core i5-9300H outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U by 197358% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i5-9300H 8107
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U 11124
+37.2%

Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U outperforms Core i5-9300H by 37% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i5-9300H 790
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U 1207
+52.8%

Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U outperforms Core i5-9300H by 53% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i5-9300H 172
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U 218
+26.7%

Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U outperforms Core i5-9300H by 27% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i5-9300H 4.7
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U 7.9
+68.1%

Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U outperforms Core i5-9300H by 68% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i5-9300H 5663
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U 5905
+4.3%

Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U outperforms Core i5-9300H by 4% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i5-9300H 49
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U 71
+42.9%

Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U outperforms Core i5-9300H by 43% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i5-9300H 194
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U 216
+11.6%

Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U outperforms Core i5-9300H by 12% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.91 9.65
Integrated graphics card 3.09 7.41
Recency 30 April 2019 16 March 2021
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 8 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 15 Watt

The Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-9300H in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-9300H and Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-9300H
Core i5-9300H
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2498 votes

Rate Core i5-9300H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 106 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-9300H or Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.