Core i3-1000G4 vs Core i5-8257U
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-8257U and Core i3-1000G4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | 1222 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Core i5 | Intel Core i3 |
Architecture codename | Coffee Lake-U (2018−2019) | Ice Lake (Client) (2019) |
Release date | 10 July 2019 (5 years ago) | 1 August 2019 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i5-8257U and Core i3-1000G4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 8 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 1.1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 1.1 GHz |
Bus type | no data | OPI |
Bus rate | no data | 4 × 4 GT/s |
Multiplier | no data | 11 |
L1 cache | 256 KB | 160 KB |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 6 MB | 4 MB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
Die size | no data | 123 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-8257U and Core i3-1000G4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
Socket | FCBGA1528 | Intel BGA 1377 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 9 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-8257U and Core i3-1000G4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | no data | + |
AVX | + | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-8257U and Core i3-1000G4 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | no data |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-8257U and Core i3-1000G4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 32 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 37.5 GB/s | 59.732 GB/s |
ECC memory support | - | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 | Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-8257U and Core i3-1000G4.
PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Integrated graphics card | 4.00 | 4.03 |
Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
Threads | 8 | 4 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 9 Watt |
i5-8257U has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
i3-1000G4, on the other hand, has 0.8% faster integrated GPU, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i5-8257U and Core i3-1000G4. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-8257U and Core i3-1000G4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.