Celeron J4025 vs Core i5-7Y57

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-7Y57
2017
2 cores / 4 threads, 4 Watt
1.67
+75.8%

i5-7Y57 outperforms Celeron J4025 by an impressive 76% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-7Y57 and Celeron J4025 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking20212457
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i5no data
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Gemini Lake Refresh (2019)
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)4 November 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$281no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-7Y57 and Celeron J4025 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz2.9 GHz
Bus typeOPIno data
Bus rate4 GT/sno data
Multiplier12no data
L1 cache128 KB56 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB4 MB (shared)
L3 cache4 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data93 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-7Y57 and Celeron J4025 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketBGAIntel BGA 1090
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-7Y57 and Celeron J4025. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX+no data
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
SIPP+no data

Security technologies

Core i5-7Y57 and Celeron J4025 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-7Y57 and Celeron J4025 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-7Y57 and Celeron J4025. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth29.861 GB/sno data
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 615Intel UHD Graphics 600

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-7Y57 and Celeron J4025.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes106

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-7Y57 1.67
+75.8%
Celeron J4025 0.95

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-7Y57 2588
+76.4%
Celeron J4025 1467

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i5-7Y57 5132
+120%
Celeron J4025 2337

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i5-7Y57 9888
+117%
Celeron J4025 4556

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i5-7Y57 3698
+43.6%
Celeron J4025 2575

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i5-7Y57 3
+65.7%
Celeron J4025 2

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i5-7Y57 273
+84.5%
Celeron J4025 148

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i5-7Y57 133
+72.7%
Celeron J4025 77

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

i5-7Y57 1.52
+58.3%
Celeron J4025 0.96

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

i5-7Y57 1.8
+80%
Celeron J4025 1

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

i5-7Y57 2105
+169%
Celeron J4025 783

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

i5-7Y57 17
+62.6%
Celeron J4025 11

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

i5-7Y57 107
+101%
Celeron J4025 53

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.67 0.95
Integrated graphics card 1.87 0.87
Recency 3 January 2017 4 November 2019
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 10 Watt

i5-7Y57 has a 75.8% higher aggregate performance score, 114.9% faster integrated GPU, 100% more threads, and 150% lower power consumption.

Celeron J4025, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years.

The Core i5-7Y57 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J4025 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i5-7Y57 is a notebook processor while Celeron J4025 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-7Y57 and Celeron J4025, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-7Y57
Core i5-7Y57
Intel Celeron J4025
Celeron J4025

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 21 vote

Rate Core i5-7Y57 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 101 vote

Rate Celeron J4025 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-7Y57 or Celeron J4025, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.