EPYC 9335 vs i5-7640K

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-7640K and EPYC 9335 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Architecture codenameKaby Lake-X (2017)Turin (2024)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,178

Detailed specifications

Core i5-7640K and EPYC 9335 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threadsno data64
Base clock speedno data3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz4.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache6144 KB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data4x 70.6 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data33,260 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-7640K and EPYC 9335 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
Socket1151SP5
Power consumption (TDP)112 Watt210 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-7640K and EPYC 9335. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-7640K and EPYC 9335 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-7640K and EPYC 9335. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-7640K and EPYC 9335.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 32
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 112 Watt 210 Watt

i5-7640K has 87.5% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9335, on the other hand, has 700% more physical cores, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core i5-7640K and EPYC 9335. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core i5-7640K is a desktop processor while EPYC 9335 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-7640K and EPYC 9335, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-7640K
Core i5-7640K
AMD EPYC 9335
EPYC 9335

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 8 votes

Rate Core i5-7640K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-7640K or EPYC 9335, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.