A10-4600M vs Core i5-7600K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-7600K
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 91 Watt
4.40
+252%

i5-7600K outperforms A10-4600M by a whopping 252% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-7600K and A10-4600M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking13102251
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.62no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i5 (Desktop)AMD A-Series
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)15 May 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$242no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-7600K and A10-4600M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus support8 GT/sno data
L1 cache256 KB192 KB
L2 cache1 MB4 MB
L3 cache6 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1303 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-7600K and A10-4600M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA1151FS1r2
Power consumption (TDP)91 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-7600K and A10-4600M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-7600K and A10-4600M are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-7600K and A10-4600M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 630AMD Radeon HD 7660G

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-7600K and A10-4600M.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-7600K 4.40
+252%
A10-4600M 1.25

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-7600K 6800
+251%
A10-4600M 1937

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i5-7600K 1511
+343%
A10-4600M 341

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i5-7600K 4235
+476%
A10-4600M 735

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i5-7600K 6814
+228%
A10-4600M 2078

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i5-7600K 24179
+324%
A10-4600M 5696

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i5-7600K 8532
+198%
A10-4600M 2866

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i5-7600K 8.49
+212%
A10-4600M 26.49

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i5-7600K 8
+292%
A10-4600M 2

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i5-7600K 674
+260%
A10-4600M 187

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i5-7600K 180
+185%
A10-4600M 63

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

i5-7600K 2.02
+189%
A10-4600M 0.7

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

i5-7600K 3.3
+175%
A10-4600M 1.2

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

i5-7600K 3570
+88.7%
A10-4600M 1892

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

i5-7600K 46
+253%
A10-4600M 13

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

i5-7600K 223
+288%
A10-4600M 58

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.40 1.25
Integrated graphics card 3.10 1.23
Recency 3 January 2017 15 May 2012
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 91 Watt 35 Watt

i5-7600K has a 252% higher aggregate performance score, 152% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

A10-4600M, on the other hand, has 160% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-7600K is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-4600M in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-7600K is a desktop processor while A10-4600M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-7600K and A10-4600M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-7600K
Core i5-7600K
AMD A10-4600M
A10-4600M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 517 votes

Rate Core i5-7600K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 485 votes

Rate A10-4600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-7600K or A10-4600M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.