i9-12900K vs i5-7400

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-7400
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
3.57
Core i9-12900K
2021
16 cores / 24 threads, 125 Watt
27.10
+659%

Core i9-12900K outperforms Core i5-7400 by a whopping 659% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-7400 and Core i9-12900K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1541183
Place by popularity42not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.0537.64
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i5Intel Core i9
Power efficiency5.0119.77
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021)
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)27 October 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$182$589

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-12900K has 3485% better value for money than i5-7400.

Detailed specifications

Core i5-7400 and Core i9-12900K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads424
Base clock speed3 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz5.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0DMI 4.0
Bus rate8 GT/s8 × 16 GT/s
Multiplier3032
L1 cache256 KB768 KB
L2 cache1 MB4 MB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)6 MB
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die sizeno data215.25 mm2"
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-7400 and Core i9-12900K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA1151FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-7400 and Core i9-12900K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i5-7400 and Core i9-12900K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-7400 and Core i9-12900K are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-7400 and Core i9-12900K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size64 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s76.805 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 630Intel UHD Graphics 770
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1 GHz1.55 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-7400 and Core i9-12900K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-7400 and Core i9-12900K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hz4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hz5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hz7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-7400 and Core i9-12900K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.54.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-7400 and Core i9-12900K.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-7400 3.57
i9-12900K 27.10
+659%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-7400 5471
i9-12900K 41470
+658%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i5-7400 1191
i9-12900K 2653
+123%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i5-7400 3276
i9-12900K 15560
+375%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.57 27.10
Integrated graphics card 3.10 6.15
Recency 3 January 2017 27 October 2021
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 4 24
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 125 Watt

i5-7400 has 92.3% lower power consumption.

i9-12900K, on the other hand, has a 659.1% higher aggregate performance score, 98.4% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 years, 300% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i9-12900K is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-7400 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-7400 and Core i9-12900K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-7400
Core i5-7400
Intel Core i9-12900K
Core i9-12900K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2585 votes

Rate Core i5-7400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 1582 votes

Rate Core i9-12900K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-7400 or Core i9-12900K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.