A4-4300M vs i5-680

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-680
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 73 Watt
1.67
+165%
A4-4300M
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.63

Core i5-680 outperforms A4-4300M by a whopping 165% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-680 and A4-4300M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20742782
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.12no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD A-Series
Power efficiency2.161.70
Architecture codenameClarkdale (2010−2011)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date19 April 2010 (14 years ago)15 May 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$272no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-680 and A4-4300M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.86 GHz3 GHz
Bus rate2.5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (shared)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size81 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Number of transistors382 million1,303 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-680 and A4-4300M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1156FS1r2
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-680 and A4-4300M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.286x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data

Security technologies

Core i5-680 and A4-4300M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-680 and A4-4300M are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-680 and A4-4300M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3unknown
Maximum memory size16.6 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel ProcessorsAMD Radeon HD 7420G (480 - 655 MHz)
Clear Video HD+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-680 and A4-4300M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-680 and A4-4300M.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-680 1.67
+165%
A4-4300M 0.63

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-680 2647
+163%
A4-4300M 1005

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i5-680 552
+86.5%
A4-4300M 296

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i5-680 1213
+209%
A4-4300M 392

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.67 0.63
Integrated graphics card 0.77 0.80
Recency 19 April 2010 15 May 2012
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 35 Watt

i5-680 has a 165.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

A4-4300M, on the other hand, has 3.9% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, and 108.6% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-680 is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-4300M in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-680 is a desktop processor while A4-4300M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-680 and A4-4300M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-680
Core i5-680
AMD A4-4300M
A4-4300M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 50 votes

Rate Core i5-680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 118 votes

Rate A4-4300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-680 or A4-4300M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.