EPYC 7473X vs i5-670

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-670
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 73 Watt
1.66
EPYC 7473X
2022
24 cores / 48 threads, 240 Watt
38.74
+2234%

EPYC 7473X outperforms Core i5-670 by a whopping 2234% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-670 and EPYC 7473X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking208985
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.09no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency2.0714.72
Architecture codenameClarkdale (2010−2011)Milan-X (2022)
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$252no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-670 and EPYC 7473X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads448
Base clock speed3.46 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.73 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rate2.5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)768 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm
Die size81 mm28x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Number of transistors382 million33,200 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-670 and EPYC 7473X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA1156SP3
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt240 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-670 and EPYC 7473X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i5-670 and EPYC 7473X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-670 and EPYC 7473X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-670 and EPYC 7473X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size16.6 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Clear Video HD+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-670 and EPYC 7473X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-670 and EPYC 7473X.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-670 1.66
EPYC 7473X 38.74
+2234%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-670 2533
EPYC 7473X 59280
+2240%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.66 38.74
Recency 7 January 2010 22 March 2022
Physical cores 2 24
Threads 4 48
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 240 Watt

i5-670 has 228.8% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7473X, on the other hand, has a 2233.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 1100% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7473X is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-670 in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-670 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7473X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-670 and EPYC 7473X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-670
Core i5-670
AMD EPYC 7473X
EPYC 7473X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 35 votes

Rate Core i5-670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate EPYC 7473X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-670 or EPYC 7473X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.