Core i9-9900T vs Core i5-6600T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-6600T
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
3.65
Core i9-9900T
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
8.60
+136%

i9-9900T outperforms i5-6600T by a whopping 136% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-6600T and Core i9-9900T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1468861
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.757.20
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i5 (Desktop)Intel Core i9
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
Release date1 September 2015 (8 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$192$439

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-9900T has 860% better value for money than i5-6600T.

Detailed specifications

Core i5-6600T and Core i9-9900T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz2.1 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
L1 cache256 KB512 KB
L2 cache1 MB2 MB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14++ nm
Die size122 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)66 °C72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-6600T and Core i9-9900T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
Socket1151FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-6600T and Core i9-9900T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX++
SIPP++

Security technologies

Core i5-6600T and Core i9-9900T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-6600T and Core i9-9900T are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-6600T and Core i9-9900T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s42.671 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 530Intel UHD Graphics 630

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-6600T and Core i9-9900T.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-6600T 3.65
i9-9900T 8.60
+136%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-6600T 5639
i9-9900T 13295
+136%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i5-6600T 1179
i9-9900T 1469
+24.6%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i5-6600T 3159
i9-9900T 5984
+89.4%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i5-6600T 5355
i9-9900T 6758
+26.2%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i5-6600T 17623
i9-9900T 31357
+77.9%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i5-6600T 6276
i9-9900T 10259
+63.5%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i5-6600T 10.06
i9-9900T 5.88
+71.1%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i5-6600T 6
i9-9900T 12
+122%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i5-6600T 465
i9-9900T 1112
+139%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i5-6600T 138
i9-9900T 185
+34.1%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

i5-6600T 1.57
i9-9900T 2.09
+33.1%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

i5-6600T 2.9
i9-9900T 4.6
+61.4%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

i5-6600T 3151
i9-9900T 6109
+93.9%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

i5-6600T 33
i9-9900T 70
+110%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

i5-6600T 164
i9-9900T 173
+5.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.65 8.60
Integrated graphics card 2.59 3.09
Recency 1 September 2015 23 April 2019
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16

i9-9900T has a 135.6% higher aggregate performance score, 19.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

The Core i9-9900T is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-6600T in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-6600T and Core i9-9900T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-6600T
Core i5-6600T
Intel Core i9-9900T
Core i9-9900T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 29 votes

Rate Core i5-6600T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 41 vote

Rate Core i9-9900T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-6600T or Core i9-9900T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.