Athlon II X2 260u vs i5-6600
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-6600 and Athlon II X2 260u processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1463 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.70 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
Series | Intel Core i5 | no data |
Power efficiency | 10.30 | no data |
Architecture codename | Skylake (2015−2016) | Regor (2009−2013) |
Release date | 1 July 2015 (9 years ago) | 20 October 2009 (15 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $224 | $83 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i5-6600 and Athlon II X2 260u basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 3.3 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
Bus type | DMI 3.0 | no data |
Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
Multiplier | 33 | no data |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 45 nm |
Die size | 177 mm2 | 117 mm2 |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 66 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | no data | 410 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-6600 and Athlon II X2 260u compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
Socket | FCLGA1151 | AM3 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-6600 and Athlon II X2 260u. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | no data |
AES-NI | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
vPro | + | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
TSX | + | - |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
SIPP | + | - |
Security technologies
Core i5-6600 and Athlon II X2 260u technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Secure Key | + | no data |
MPX | + | - |
Identity Protection | + | - |
SGX | Yes with Intel® ME | no data |
OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-6600 and Athlon II X2 260u are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-6600 and Athlon II X2 260u. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR3 |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.134 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 530 | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Max video memory | 64 GB | no data |
Quick Sync Video | + | - |
Clear Video | + | no data |
Clear Video HD | + | no data |
Graphics max frequency | 1.15 GHz | no data |
InTru 3D | + | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-6600 and Athlon II X2 260u integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
eDP | + | no data |
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
DVI | + | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-6600 and Athlon II X2 260u integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
4K resolution support | + | no data |
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | no data |
Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | no data |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | no data |
Max resolution over VGA | N/A | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core i5-6600 and Athlon II X2 260u integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | 12 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.5 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-6600 and Athlon II X2 260u.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 2.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 July 2015 | 20 October 2009 |
Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 45 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 25 Watt |
i5-6600 has an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.
Athlon II X2 260u, on the other hand, has 160% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i5-6600 and Athlon II X2 260u. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-6600 and Athlon II X2 260u, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.