Athlon 5370 vs i5-655K

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-655K
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 73 Watt
1.27
+5.8%
Athlon 5370
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
1.20

Core i5-655K outperforms Athlon 5370 by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-655K and Athlon 5370 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23022354
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.654.54
Architecture codenameClarkdale (2010−2011)Kabini (2013−2014)
Release date30 May 2010 (14 years ago)9 April 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core i5-655K and Athlon 5370 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.46 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rate2.5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2048 KB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size81 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °C76 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data90 °C
Number of transistors382 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-655K and Athlon 5370 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1156AM1
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-655K and Athlon 5370. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
FMA-FMA4
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data

Security technologies

Core i5-655K and Athlon 5370 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-655K and Athlon 5370 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-655K and Athlon 5370. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1600
Maximum memory size16.38 GBno data
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel ProcessorsAMD Radeon R3 Graphics
จำนวนพาธไลน์no data128
Clear Video HD+no data
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-655K and Athlon 5370 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-655K and Athlon 5370 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-655K and Athlon 5370.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes164

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-655K 1.27
+5.8%
Athlon 5370 1.20

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-655K 2017
+5.9%
Athlon 5370 1905

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.27 1.20
Recency 30 May 2010 9 April 2014
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 25 Watt

i5-655K has a 5.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Athlon 5370, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 192% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i5-655K and Athlon 5370.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-655K and Athlon 5370, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-655K
Core i5-655K
AMD Athlon 5370
Athlon 5370

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 20 votes

Rate Core i5-655K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 14 votes

Rate Athlon 5370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-655K or Athlon 5370, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.