A6-9500E vs i5-655K

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-655K
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 73 Watt
1.27
+14.4%
A6-9500E
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.11

Core i5-655K outperforms A6-9500E by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-655K and A6-9500E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22862398
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.653.00
Architecture codenameClarkdale (2010−2011)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date30 May 2010 (14 years ago)27 July 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core i5-655K and A6-9500E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.46 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus rate2.5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1024 KB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size81 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors382 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-655K and A6-9500E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1156AM4
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-655K and A6-9500E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX-+
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
PowerTune-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data

Security technologies

Core i5-655K and A6-9500E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-655K and A6-9500E are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-655K and A6-9500E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size16.38 GBno data
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® ProcessorsAMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core countno data4
Clear Video HD+no data
Enduro-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-655K and A6-9500E integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-655K and A6-9500E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-655K and A6-9500E.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes168

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-655K 1.27
+14.4%
A6-9500E 1.11

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-655K 2017
+14.9%
A6-9500E 1756

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.27 1.11
Recency 30 May 2010 27 July 2017
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 35 Watt

i5-655K has a 14.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

A6-9500E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 108.6% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-655K is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-9500E in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-655K and A6-9500E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-655K
Core i5-655K
AMD A6-9500E
A6-9500E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 20 votes

Rate Core i5-655K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 48 votes

Rate A6-9500E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-655K or A6-9500E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.