EPYC 7F72 vs Core i5-650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-650
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 73 Watt
1.45
EPYC 7F72
2020
24 cores / 48 threads, 240 Watt
34.01
+2246%

EPYC 7F72 outperforms i5-650 by a whopping 2246% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-650 and EPYC 7F72 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2093101
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.938.30
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameClarkdale (2010−2011)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)14 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$35$2,450
Current price$30 (0.9x MSRP)$3606 (1.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7F72 has 68% better value for money than i5-650.

Detailed specifications

Core i5-650 and EPYC 7F72 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads448
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.46 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)192 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size81 mm274 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Number of transistors382 million3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-650 and EPYC 7F72 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA1156SP3
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt240 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-650 and EPYC 7F72. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i5-650 and EPYC 7F72 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-650 and EPYC 7F72 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-650 and EPYC 7F72. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size16.38 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Clear Video HD+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-650 and EPYC 7F72 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-650 and EPYC 7F72.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-650 1.45
EPYC 7F72 34.01
+2246%

EPYC 7F72 outperforms Core i5-650 by 2246% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i5-650 2245
EPYC 7F72 52597
+2243%

EPYC 7F72 outperforms Core i5-650 by 2243% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i5-650 454
EPYC 7F72 1318
+190%

EPYC 7F72 outperforms Core i5-650 by 190% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i5-650 928
EPYC 7F72 11819
+1174%

EPYC 7F72 outperforms Core i5-650 by 1174% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.45 34.01
Recency 7 January 2010 14 April 2020
Physical cores 2 24
Threads 4 48
Cost $35 $2450
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 240 Watt

The EPYC 7F72 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-650 in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-650 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7F72 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-650 and EPYC 7F72, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-650
Core i5-650
AMD EPYC 7F72
EPYC 7F72

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 959 votes

Rate Core i5-650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate EPYC 7F72 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-650 or EPYC 7F72, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.