Xeon X5460 vs i5-6442EQ

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-6442EQ
2015, $250
4 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
2.56
+74.1%
Xeon X5460
2007, $1,172
4 cores / 4 threads, 120 Watt
1.47

Core i5-6442EQ outperforms Xeon X5460 by an impressive 74% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19852406
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.390.03
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core i5no data
Power efficiency4.320.52
DesignerIntelIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Harpertown (2007−2008)
Release date12 October 2015 (10 years ago)11 November 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$250$1,172

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-6442EQ has 1200% better value for money than Xeon X5460.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core i5-6442EQ and Xeon X5460 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speedno data3.16 GHz
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz0.17 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier19no data
L1 cache256 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB6 MB (per die)
L3 cache6 MB12 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die size122 mm22x 107 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data63 °C
Number of transistorsno data820 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.35V

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-6442EQ and Xeon X5460 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
Socketno dataLGA771
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-6442EQ and Xeon X5460. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
FSB parityno data+

Security technologies

Core i5-6442EQ and Xeon X5460 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-6442EQ and Xeon X5460 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPTno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-6442EQ and Xeon X5460. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 530N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-6442EQ and Xeon X5460.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

i5-6442EQ 2.56
+74.1%
Xeon X5460 1.47

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

i5-6442EQ 4483
+74.4%
Samples: 6
Xeon X5460 2571
Samples: 761

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.56 1.47
Recency 12 October 2015 11 November 2007
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 120 Watt

i5-6442EQ has a 74% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 221% more advanced lithography process, and 380% lower power consumption.

The Intel Core i5-6442EQ is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon X5460 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i5-6442EQ is a notebook processor while Xeon X5460 is a server/workstation one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i5-6442EQ on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 357 votes

Rate Xeon X5460 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core i5-6442EQ and Xeon X5460, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.