i7-620M vs i5-6400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-6400
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
3.41
+173%
Core i7-620M
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.25

Core i5-6400 outperforms Core i7-620M by a whopping 173% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-6400 and Core i7-620M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15642313
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.78no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i5Intel Core i7
Power efficiency4.963.38
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release date2 July 2015 (9 years ago)7 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$187$332

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-6400 and Core i7-620M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.66 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.33 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0DMI 1.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplier2715
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size177 mm281+114 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data384 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-6400 and Core i7-620M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1151BGA1288,PGA988
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-6400 and Core i7-620M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX+-
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0+
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Core i5-6400 and Core i7-620M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-6400 and Core i7-620M are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-6400 and Core i7-620M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s17.051 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 530Intel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processors
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency950 MHz766 MHz
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-6400 and Core i7-620M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-6400 and Core i7-620M integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-6400 and Core i7-620M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-6400 and Core i7-620M.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-6400 3.41
+173%
i7-620M 1.25

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-6400 5417
+174%
i7-620M 1979

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i5-6400 1125
+154%
i7-620M 443

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i5-6400 3065
+272%
i7-620M 823

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i5-6400 5088
+46.5%
i7-620M 3473

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i5-6400 18297
+139%
i7-620M 7657

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i5-6400 10.48
+71.8%
i7-620M 18

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i5-6400 6
+146%
i7-620M 2

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.41 1.25
Integrated graphics card 2.60 0.77
Recency 2 July 2015 7 January 2010
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

i5-6400 has a 172.8% higher aggregate performance score, 237.7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

i7-620M, on the other hand, has 85.7% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-6400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-620M in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-6400 is a desktop processor while Core i7-620M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-6400 and Core i7-620M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-6400
Core i5-6400
Intel Core i7-620M
Core i7-620M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1246 votes

Rate Core i5-6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 328 votes

Rate Core i7-620M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-6400 or Core i7-620M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.