Athlon 64 3000+ vs Core i5-6400
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-6400 and Athlon 64 3000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | 1504 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.70 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
Series | Intel Core i5 | no data |
Architecture codename | Skylake (2015−2016) | Clawhammer (2001−2005) |
Release date | 1 September 2015 (8 years ago) | January 2001 (23 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $187 | $65 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i5-6400 and Athlon 64 3000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 2.7 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 2 GHz |
Bus support | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
L1 cache | 256 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 512K |
L3 cache | 6 MB | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 130 nm |
Die size | 122 mm2 | 193 mm2 |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | no data | 154 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-6400 and Athlon 64 3000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
Socket | FCLGA1151 | 754 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 89 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-6400 and Athlon 64 3000+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | no data |
AVX | + | no data |
vPro | + | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
TSX | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-6400 and Athlon 64 3000+ are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | no data |
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-6400 and Athlon 64 3000+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | no data |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.134 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | - | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 530 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-6400 and Athlon 64 3000+.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
Threads | 4 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 130 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 89 Watt |
i5-6400 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 828.6% more advanced lithography process, and 36.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i5-6400 and Athlon 64 3000+. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-6400 and Athlon 64 3000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.