Processor N95 vs Core i5-6300HQ

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core i5-6300HQ
2015
4 cores / 4 threads
2.99
Processor N95
2023
4 cores / 44 x 3.4 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core threads
3.05
+2%

Processor N95 outperforms Core i5-6300HQ by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Core i5-6300HQ and Processor N95 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking15241514
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i5Intel Alder Lake-N
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Alder Lake-N
Release date1 September 2015 (8 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$250no data
Current price$936 (3.7x MSRP)no data

Detailed Specifications

Core i5-6300HQ and Processor N95 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads444 x 3.4  GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
Base clock speed2.3 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache256 KB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB2 MB (shared)
L3 cache6 MB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size122 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-6300HQ and Processor N95 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1440Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-6300HQ and Processor N95. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP-no data
Smart Response+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i5-6300HQ and Processor N95 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+no data
Identity Protection+no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-6300HQ and Processor N95 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-6300HQ and Processor N95. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR4, DDR5, DDR5
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.1 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 530Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency950 MHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-6300HQ and Processor N95 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-6300HQ and Processor N95 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-6300HQ and Processor N95 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-6300HQ and Processor N95.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes169

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-6300HQ 2.99
Processor N95 3.05
+2%

Processor N95 outperforms Core i5-6300HQ by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i5-6300HQ 4851
+1.4%
Processor N95 4783

Core i5-6300HQ outperforms Processor N95 by 1% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i5-6300HQ 16533
+19.3%
Processor N95 13854

Core i5-6300HQ outperforms Processor N95 by 19% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i5-6300HQ 5750
Processor N95 5952
+3.5%

Processor N95 outperforms Core i5-6300HQ by 4% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i5-6300HQ 12.25
+39.1%
Processor N95 17.04

Processor N95 outperforms Core i5-6300HQ by 39% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i5-6300HQ 5
Processor N95 6
+3.9%

Processor N95 outperforms Core i5-6300HQ by 4% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i5-6300HQ 466
+4.7%
Processor N95 445

Core i5-6300HQ outperforms Processor N95 by 5% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i5-6300HQ 131
Processor N95 151
+15.3%

Processor N95 outperforms Core i5-6300HQ by 15% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i5-6300HQ 1.48
Processor N95 1.83
+23.6%

Processor N95 outperforms Core i5-6300HQ by 24% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i5-6300HQ 2.5
Processor N95 2.7
+10.2%

Processor N95 outperforms Core i5-6300HQ by 10% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i5-6300HQ 2877
+24%
Processor N95 2320

Core i5-6300HQ outperforms Processor N95 by 24% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i5-6300HQ 151
Processor N95 162
+7.4%

Processor N95 outperforms Core i5-6300HQ by 7% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i5-6300HQ 31
Processor N95 32
+4%

Processor N95 outperforms Core i5-6300HQ by 4% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 2.99 3.05
Integrated graphics card 2.59 2.28
Recency 1 September 2015 3 January 2023
Threads 4 44 x 3.4 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 15 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i5-6300HQ and Processor N95.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-6300HQ and Processor N95, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-6300HQ
Core i5-6300HQ
Intel Processor N95
Processor N95

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 202 votes

Rate Core i5-6300HQ on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 440 votes

Rate Processor N95 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-6300HQ or Processor N95, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.