A9-9420e vs Core i5-6300HQ

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-6300HQ
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
3.04
+328%

i5-6300HQ outperforms A9-9420e by a whopping 328% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-6300HQ and A9-9420e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking15992652
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i5AMD Bristol Ridge
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date1 September 2015 (8 years ago)1 June 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$250no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-6300HQ and A9-9420e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Boost clock speed2.3 GHzno data
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier23no data
L1 cache256 KBno data
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cache6 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die size122 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C90 °C
Number of transistorsno data1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-6300HQ and A9-9420e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketBGABGA
Power consumption (TDP)45 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-6300HQ and A9-9420e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataVirtualization,
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-6300HQ and A9-9420e are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-6300HQ and A9-9420e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 530AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-6300HQ and A9-9420e.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-6300HQ 3.04
+328%
A9-9420e 0.71

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-6300HQ 4698
+326%
A9-9420e 1104

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i5-6300HQ 466
+380%
A9-9420e 97

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.04 0.71
Integrated graphics card 2.59 1.33
Recency 1 September 2015 1 June 2018
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm

i5-6300HQ has a 328.2% higher aggregate performance score, 94.7% faster integrated GPU, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

A9-9420e, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years.

The Core i5-6300HQ is our recommended choice as it beats the A9-9420e in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-6300HQ and A9-9420e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-6300HQ
Core i5-6300HQ
AMD A9-9420e
A9-9420e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 232 votes

Rate Core i5-6300HQ on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 142 votes

Rate A9-9420e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-6300HQ or A9-9420e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.