Ultra 9 285K vs i5-560UM

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-560UM
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 18 Watt
0.66
Core Ultra 9 285K
2024
24 cores / 24 threads, 125 Watt
43.75
+6529%

Core Ultra 9 285K outperforms Core i5-560UM by a whopping 6529% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-560UM and Core Ultra 9 285K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking275054
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data71.40
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i5no data
Power efficiency3.3431.91
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date26 September 2010 (14 years ago)24 October 2024 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$250$589

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-560UM and Core Ultra 9 285K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads424
Base clock speed1.33 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.13 GHz5.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/s250 MHz
Multiplier10no data
L1 cache128 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB3 MB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm3 nm
Die size81+114 mm2243 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors382+177 Million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-560UM and Core Ultra 9 285K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketBGA12881851
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-560UM and Core Ultra 9 285K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX-+
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i5-560UM and Core Ultra 9 285K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-560UM and Core Ultra 9 285K are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-560UM and Core Ultra 9 285K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5 Depends on motherboard
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth12.799 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® ProcessorsArc Xe-2 Graphics 64EU
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency500 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-560UM and Core Ultra 9 285K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-560UM and Core Ultra 9 285K.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-560UM 0.66
Ultra 9 285K 43.75
+6529%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-560UM 1015
Ultra 9 285K 66951
+6496%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.66 43.75
Recency 26 September 2010 24 October 2024
Physical cores 2 24
Threads 4 24
Chip lithography 32 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 125 Watt

i5-560UM has 594.4% lower power consumption.

Ultra 9 285K, on the other hand, has a 6528.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, 1100% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 966.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 9 285K is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-560UM in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i5-560UM is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 9 285K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-560UM and Core Ultra 9 285K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-560UM
Core i5-560UM
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Core Ultra 9 285K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 3 votes

Rate Core i5-560UM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 72 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-560UM or Core Ultra 9 285K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.