Celeron 847E vs i5-520UM

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-520UM
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 18 Watt
0.57
+54.1%
Celeron 847E
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.37

Core i5-520UM outperforms Celeron 847E by an impressive 54% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-520UM and Celeron 847E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28123030
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i5Intel Celeron
Power efficiency3.00no data
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$241$111

Detailed specifications

Core i5-520UM and Celeron 847E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.07 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.87 GHz1.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0DMI 2.0
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/s4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplier811
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB512 KB
L3 cache3 MB2 MB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size81+114 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors382+177 Million504 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-520UM and Celeron 847E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketBGA1288no data
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-520UM and Celeron 847E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
FMA++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i5-520UM and Celeron 847E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-520UM and Celeron 847E are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-520UM and Celeron 847E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800DDR3-1333
Maximum memory size8 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth12.799 GB/s21.335 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency500 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-520UM and Celeron 847E integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-520UM and Celeron 847E.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-520UM 0.57
+54.1%
Celeron 847E 0.37

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-520UM 908
+55.5%
Celeron 847E 584

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.57 0.37
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 17 Watt

i5-520UM has a 54.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

Celeron 847E, on the other hand, has 5.9% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-520UM is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 847E in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-520UM and Celeron 847E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-520UM
Core i5-520UM
Intel Celeron 847E
Celeron 847E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Core i5-520UM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate Celeron 847E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-520UM or Celeron 847E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.