Core 2 Duo T5600 vs Core i5-520M
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-520M and Core 2 Duo T5600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2303 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core i5 | Intel Core 2 Duo |
| Architecture codename | Arrandale (2010−2011) | Merom (2006−2008) |
| Release date | 4 January 2010 (14 years ago) | 28 July 2006 (17 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $225 | $241 |
| Current price | $108 (0.5x MSRP) | $31 (0.1x MSRP) |
Detailed specifications
Core i5-520M and Core 2 Duo T5600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.93 GHz | 1.83 GHz |
| Bus support | 2500 MHz | 667 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 81+114 mm2 | 143 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 382+177 Million | 291 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-520M and Core 2 Duo T5600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | BGA1288, PGA988 | PBGA479, PPGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 34 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-520M and Core 2 Duo T5600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | no data |
| FMA | + | no data |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | + | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Security technologies
Core i5-520M and Core 2 Duo T5600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-520M and Core 2 Duo T5600 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-520M and Core 2 Duo T5600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1280 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 17.051 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | - | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-520M and Core 2 Duo T5600.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i5-520M outperforms Core 2 Duo T5600 by 160% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i5-520M outperforms Core 2 Duo T5600 by 59% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i5-520M outperforms Core 2 Duo T5600 by 71% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Core i5-520M outperforms Core 2 Duo T5600 by 75% in 3DMark06 CPU.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Benchmark coverage: 18%
Core 2 Duo T5600 outperforms Core i5-520M by 144% in wPrime 32.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 4 January 2010 | 28 July 2006 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Cost | $225 | $241 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 34 Watt |
i5-520M has an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more threads, its recommended price lower by $16, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.
Core 2 Duo T5600, on the other hand, has 2.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i5-520M and Core 2 Duo T5600. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-520M and Core 2 Duo T5600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
