Processor N200 vs i5-4400E
Aggregate performance score
Core i5-4400E outperforms Processor N200 by a substantial 32% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2221 | 2438 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.19 | 4.51 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core i5 | Intel Alder Lake-N |
| Power efficiency | 2.12 | 9.92 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Haswell (2013−2015) | Alder Lake-N (2023) |
| Release date | 1 October 2013 (12 years ago) | 3 January 2023 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $266 | $193 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Processor N200 has 2274% better value for money than i5-4400E.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Core i5-4400E and Processor N200: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 0.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 130 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 960 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-4400E and Processor N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA1364 | Intel BGA 1264 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 37 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-4400E and Processor N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Security technologies
Core i5-4400E and Processor N200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-4400E and Processor N200 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-4400E and Processor N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 4600 (400 - 1000 MHz) | Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-4400E and Processor N200.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 9 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.86 | 1.41 |
| Integrated graphics card | 1.70 | 3.05 |
| Recency | 1 October 2013 | 3 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 37 Watt | 6 Watt |
i5-4400E has a 32% higher aggregate performance score.
Processor N200, on the other hand, has 79% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 9 years, 100% more physical cores, a 120% more advanced lithography process, and 517% lower power consumption.
The Intel Core i5-4400E is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Processor N200 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
