A4-6210 vs Core i5-4210H

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-4210H
2014
2 cores / 4 threads, 47 Watt
1.97
+103%

i5-4210H outperforms A4-6210 by a whopping 103% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-4210H and A4-6210 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking18602404
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i5AMD A-Series
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Beema (2014)
Release date21 July 2014 (10 years ago)29 April 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-4210H and A4-6210 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.9 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz1.8 GHz
L1 cache128 KB256 KB
L2 cache512 KB2 MB
L3 cache3 MBno data
Chip lithography22 nm28 nm
Die size130 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors960 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-4210H and A4-6210 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA1364no data
Power consumption (TDP)47 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-4210H and A4-6210. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, Single-Channel DDR3L-1600
AES-NI++
AVX++
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-4210H and A4-6210 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-4210H and A4-6210. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 4600AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-4210H and A4-6210.

PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-4210H 1.97
+103%
A4-6210 0.97

Core i5-4210H outperforms A4-6210 by 103% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i5-4210H 3051
+104%
A4-6210 1498

Core i5-4210H outperforms A4-6210 by 104% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i5-4210H 982
+420%
A4-6210 189

Core i5-4210H outperforms A4-6210 by 420% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i5-4210H 1886
+251%
A4-6210 538

Core i5-4210H outperforms A4-6210 by 251% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i5-4210H 5019
+265%
A4-6210 1374

Core i5-4210H outperforms A4-6210 by 265% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i5-4210H 11075
+158%
A4-6210 4285

Core i5-4210H outperforms A4-6210 by 158% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i5-4210H 4462
+86.1%
A4-6210 2398

Core i5-4210H outperforms A4-6210 by 86% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i5-4210H 15.52
+119%
A4-6210 34.05

A4-6210 outperforms Core i5-4210H by 119% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i5-4210H 4
+109%
A4-6210 2

Core i5-4210H outperforms A4-6210 by 109% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i5-4210H 330
+145%
A4-6210 135

Core i5-4210H outperforms A4-6210 by 145% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i5-4210H 129
+244%
A4-6210 38

Core i5-4210H outperforms A4-6210 by 244% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i5-4210H 1.5
+226%
A4-6210 0.46

Core i5-4210H outperforms A4-6210 by 226% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i5-4210H 2
+100%
A4-6210 1

Core i5-4210H outperforms A4-6210 by 100% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i5-4210H 2410
+143%
A4-6210 992

Core i5-4210H outperforms A4-6210 by 143% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i5-4210H 21
+112%
A4-6210 10

Core i5-4210H outperforms A4-6210 by 112% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i5-4210H 105
+124%
A4-6210 47

Core i5-4210H outperforms A4-6210 by 124% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

i5-4210H 6311
+99.7%
A4-6210 3160

Core i5-4210H outperforms A4-6210 by 100% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

i5-4210H 2938
+194%
A4-6210 1001

Core i5-4210H outperforms A4-6210 by 194% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.

Geekbench 2

Benchmark coverage: 5%

i5-4210H 6586
+93.3%
A4-6210 3408

Core i5-4210H outperforms A4-6210 by 93% in Geekbench 2.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.97 0.97
Integrated graphics card 1.84 0.84
Recency 21 July 2014 29 April 2014
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 47 Watt 15 Watt

i5-4210H has a 103.1% higher aggregate performance score, 119% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 months, and a 27.3% more advanced lithography process.

A4-6210, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores, and 213.3% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-4210H is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-6210 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-4210H and A4-6210, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-4210H
Core i5-4210H
AMD A4-6210
A4-6210

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 75 votes

Rate Core i5-4210H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 150 votes

Rate A4-6210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-4210H or A4-6210, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.