Ryzen 7 4800U vs Core i5-3470
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 7 4800U outperforms i5-3470 by a whopping 258% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-3470 and Ryzen 7 4800U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | 1560 | 673 |
Place by popularity | 10 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.47 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | Intel Core i5 (Desktop) | AMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU) |
Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Renoir-U (Zen 2) |
Release date | 1 June 2012 (12 years ago) | 6 January 2020 (4 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $184 | no data |
Current price | $57 (0.3x MSRP) | $556 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i5-3470 and Ryzen 7 4800U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 16 |
Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128K (per core) |
L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 7 nm |
Die size | 132.8 mm2 | 156 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 67 °C | 105 °C |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 67 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | no data | 9800 Million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-3470 and Ryzen 7 4800U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FCLGA1155 | FP6 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 77 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-3470 and Ryzen 7 4800U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX | DDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | no data | + |
AVX | + | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
TSX | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | no data |
FDI | + | no data |
Status | Discontinued | no data |
Security technologies
Core i5-3470 and Ryzen 7 4800U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Secure Key | + | no data |
Identity Protection | + | no data |
Anti-Theft | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-3470 and Ryzen 7 4800U are enumerated here.
AMD-V | no data | + |
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-3470 and Ryzen 7 4800U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 64 GB |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 68.27 GB/s |
ECC memory support | - | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics 2500 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) |
Quick Sync Video | + | no data |
Clear Video HD | + | no data |
Graphics max frequency | 1.1 GHz | no data |
InTru 3D | + | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-3470 and Ryzen 7 4800U integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-3470 and Ryzen 7 4800U.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Ryzen 7 4800U outperforms Core i5-3470 by 258% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Ryzen 7 4800U outperforms Core i5-3470 by 257% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Ryzen 7 4800U outperforms Core i5-3470 by 125% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Ryzen 7 4800U outperforms Core i5-3470 by 206% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Benchmark coverage: 20%
Ryzen 7 4800U outperforms Core i5-3470 by 14% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Ryzen 7 4800U outperforms Core i5-3470 by 96% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Ryzen 7 4800U outperforms Core i5-3470 by 66% in 3DMark06 CPU.
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Ryzen 7 4800U outperforms Core i5-3470 by 220% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
Ryzen 7 4800U outperforms Core i5-3470 by 42% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 3.02 | 10.80 |
Integrated graphics card | 0.68 | 9.08 |
Recency | 1 June 2012 | 6 January 2020 |
Physical cores | 4 | 8 |
Threads | 4 | 16 |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 7 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 77 Watt | 25 Watt |
The Ryzen 7 4800U is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-3470 in performance tests.
Note that Core i5-3470 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 4800U is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-3470 and Ryzen 7 4800U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.