Celeron N2807 vs Core i5-3470

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-3470 and Celeron N2807 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1557not rated
Place by popularity10not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.47no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i5 (Desktop)Intel Celeron
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date1 June 2012 (12 years ago)23 February 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$184$107
Current price$66 (0.4x MSRP)$251 (2.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-3470 and Celeron N2807 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.2 GHz1.58 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz2.16 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)56K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Die size132.8 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature67 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)67 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-3470 and Celeron N2807 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)77 Watt4.3 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-3470 and Celeron N2807. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology--
TSX-no data
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Smart Connectno data+
FDI+no data
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Core i5-3470 and Celeron N2807 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-3470 and Celeron N2807 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-3470 and Celeron N2807. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB4 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 2500Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHz750 MHz
InTru 3D+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-3470 and Celeron N2807 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-3470 and Celeron N2807.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data4
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i5-3470 4677
+826%
Celeron N2807 505

Core i5-3470 outperforms Celeron N2807 by 826% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i5-3470 621
+337%
Celeron N2807 142

Core i5-3470 outperforms Celeron N2807 by 337% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i5-3470 1839
+666%
Celeron N2807 240

Core i5-3470 outperforms Celeron N2807 by 666% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i5-3470 5006
+408%
Celeron N2807 986

Core i5-3470 outperforms Celeron N2807 by 408% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i5-3470 17192
+721%
Celeron N2807 2093

Core i5-3470 outperforms Celeron N2807 by 721% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i5-3470 6
+931%
Celeron N2807 1

Core i5-3470 outperforms Celeron N2807 by 931% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i5-3470 1.51
+481%
Celeron N2807 0.26

Core i5-3470 outperforms Celeron N2807 by 481% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

Geekbench 2

Benchmark coverage: 5%

i5-3470 9721
+486%
Celeron N2807 1658

Core i5-3470 outperforms Celeron N2807 by 486% in Geekbench 2.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2012 23 February 2014
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Cost $184 $107
Power consumption (TDP) 77 Watt 4 Watt

We couldn't decide between Core i5-3470 and Celeron N2807. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core i5-3470 is a desktop processor while Celeron N2807 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-3470 and Celeron N2807, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-3470
Core i5-3470
Intel Celeron N2807
Celeron N2807

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 5259 votes

Rate Core i5-3470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 32 votes

Rate Celeron N2807 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-3470 or Celeron N2807, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.