Celeron 440 vs i5-3470

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-3470
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 77 Watt
2.95
+1183%
Celeron 440
2007
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.23

Core i5-3470 outperforms Celeron 440 by a whopping 1183% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-3470 and Celeron 440 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16543187
Place by popularity15not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.59no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i5 (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency3.630.62
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Conroe-L (2007−2008)
Release date1 June 2012 (12 years ago)June 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$184$40

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-3470 and Celeron 440 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)512 KB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm65 nm
Die size132.8 mm277 mm2
Maximum core temperature67 °C60 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)67 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data105 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1V-1.3375V

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-3470 and Celeron 440 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)77 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-3470 and Celeron 440. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+-
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDI+no data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Core i5-3470 and Celeron 440 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-3470 and Celeron 440 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-3470 and Celeron 440. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 2500no data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-3470 and Celeron 440 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-3470 and Celeron 440.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-3470 2.95
+1183%
Celeron 440 0.23

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-3470 4679
+1171%
Celeron 440 368

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.95 0.23
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 22 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 77 Watt 35 Watt

i5-3470 has a 1182.6% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 195.5% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron 440, on the other hand, has 120% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-3470 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 440 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-3470 and Celeron 440, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-3470
Core i5-3470
Intel Celeron 440
Celeron 440

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 5915 votes

Rate Core i5-3470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 60 votes

Rate Celeron 440 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-3470 or Celeron 440, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.