PRO A12-8870E vs i5-3450

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-3450 and PRO A12-8870E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	1669	1963
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.54	no data
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Power efficiency	3.48	5.14
Architecture codename	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Carrizo (2015−2018)
Release date	29 April 2012 (12 years ago)	October 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$186	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Core i5-3450 and PRO A12-8870E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	4	4
Base clock speed	3.1 GHz	2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.5 GHz	3.8 GHz
Bus rate	5 GT/s	no data
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	no data
L2 cache	256 KB (per core)	2048 KB
L3 cache	6144 KB (shared)	no data
Chip lithography	22 nm	28 nm
Die size	160 mm2	250 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	67 °C	no data
Number of transistors	1,400 million	3,100 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-3450 and PRO A12-8870E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FCLGA1155	AM4
Power consumption (TDP)	77 Watt	35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-3450 and PRO A12-8870E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX	no data
AES-NI	+	+
FMA	-	+
AVX	+	+
FRTC	-	+
FreeSync	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	2.0	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
FDI	+	no data

Security technologies

Core i5-3450 and PRO A12-8870E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	+	no data
Secure Key	+	no data
Identity Protection	+	-
Anti-Theft	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-3450 and PRO A12-8870E are enumerated here.

AMD-V	-	+
VT-d	-	no data
VT-x	+	no data
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-3450 and PRO A12-8870E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size	32 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card Compare	Intel HD Graphics 2500	AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core count	no data	8
Quick Sync Video	+	-
Clear Video HD	+	no data
Enduro	-	n/a
Switchable graphics	-	+
Graphics max frequency	1.1 GHz	no data
InTru 3D	+	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-3450 and PRO A12-8870E integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported	3	no data
DisplayPort	-	n/a

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-3450 and PRO A12-8870E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	no data	DirectX® 12
Vulkan	-	+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-3450 and PRO A12-8870E.

PCIe version

3.0

3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	2.83	1.90
Chip lithography	22 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	77 Watt	35 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-3450 and PRO A12-8870E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---