Xeon E5-4610 vs i5-3360M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-3360M
2012
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.86
Xeon E5-4610
2012
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
4.18
+125%

Xeon E5-4610 outperforms i5-3360M by a whopping 125% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-3360M and Xeon E5-4610 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking19521359
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core i5no data
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
Release date3 June 2012 (12 years ago)14 May 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$266no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-3360M and Xeon E5-4610 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz2.9 GHz
L1 cache128 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB15 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size118 mm2435 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data2,270 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-3360M and Xeon E5-4610 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration14
SocketFCBGA1023,FCPGA988FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-3360M and Xeon E5-4610. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® AVX
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+-
Demand Based Switching-+
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core i5-3360M and Xeon E5-4610 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-3360M and Xeon E5-4610 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-3360M and Xeon E5-4610. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB384 GB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s42.6 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 4000no data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-3360M and Xeon E5-4610 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-3360M and Xeon E5-4610.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1640

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-3360M 1.86
Xeon E5-4610 4.18
+125%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-3360M 2871
Xeon E5-4610 6460
+125%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.86 4.18
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 4 12
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 95 Watt

i5-3360M has a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 171.4% lower power consumption.

Xeon E5-4610, on the other hand, has a 124.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

The Xeon E5-4610 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-3360M in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i5-3360M is a notebook processor while Xeon E5-4610 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-3360M and Xeon E5-4610, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-3360M
Core i5-3360M
Intel Xeon E5-4610
Xeon E5-4610

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 92 votes

Rate Core i5-3360M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Xeon E5-4610 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-3360M or Xeon E5-4610, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.