Pro A12-8800B vs i5-3350P

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-3350P
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 69 Watt
2.70
+66.7%
Pro A12-8800B
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.62

Core i5-3350P outperforms Pro A12-8800B by an impressive 67% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-3350P and Pro A12-8800B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17112096
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.31no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Carrizo
Power efficiency3.704.38
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Carrizo (2015−2018)
Release date3 September 2012 (12 years ago)3 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$292no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-3350P and Pro A12-8800B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.1 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2048 KB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography22 nm28 nm
Die size133 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data3100 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-3350P and Pro A12-8800B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1155FP4
Power consumption (TDP)69 Watt12-35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-3350P and Pro A12-8800B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXHSA 1.0
AES-NI++
FMA-FMA4
AVX+AVX
FreeSync-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
RAID-+
HSA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Core i5-3350P and Pro A12-8800B technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-3350P and Pro A12-8800B are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-3350P and Pro A12-8800B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3/DDR3L-2133
Maximum memory size32.23 GBno data
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core countno data8
จำนวนพาธไลน์no data512
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-3350P and Pro A12-8800B integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-3350P and Pro A12-8800B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-3350P and Pro A12-8800B.

PCIe version3.03.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-3350P 2.70
+66.7%
Pro A12-8800B 1.62

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-3350P 4291
+66.3%
Pro A12-8800B 2580

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i5-3350P 588
+11.8%
Pro A12-8800B 526

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i5-3350P 1744
+52.8%
Pro A12-8800B 1141

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.70 1.62
Recency 3 September 2012 3 June 2015
Chip lithography 22 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 69 Watt 12 Watt

i5-3350P has a 66.7% higher aggregate performance score, and a 27.3% more advanced lithography process.

Pro A12-8800B, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 475% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-3350P is our recommended choice as it beats the Pro A12-8800B in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-3350P is a desktop processor while Pro A12-8800B is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-3350P and Pro A12-8800B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-3350P
Core i5-3350P
AMD Pro A12-8800B
Pro A12-8800B

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 249 votes

Rate Core i5-3350P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 5 votes

Rate Pro A12-8800B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-3350P or Pro A12-8800B, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.