Celeron 877 vs i5-3340M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-3340M
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.70
+286%
Celeron 877
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.44

Core i5-3340M outperforms Celeron 877 by a whopping 286% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-3340M and Celeron 877 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20582961
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i5Intel Celeron
Power efficiency4.602.45
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date1 January 2013 (11 years ago)1 July 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225$86

Detailed specifications

Core i5-3340M and Celeron 877 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.7 GHz1.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz1.4 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rate5 GT/s4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data14
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size118 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-3340M and Celeron 877 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1023,FCPGA988FCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-3340M and Celeron 877. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMA-+
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+-
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
Demand Based Switching--
FDI++
Fast Memory Access++

Security technologies

Core i5-3340M and Celeron 877 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-3340M and Celeron 877 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-3340M and Celeron 877. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 4000Intel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel Processors
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency1.25 GHz1 GHz
InTru 3D+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-3340M and Celeron 877 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
SDVO++
CRT++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-3340M and Celeron 877.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-3340M 1.70
+286%
Celeron 877 0.44

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-3340M 2697
+289%
Celeron 877 693

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i5-3340M 525
+117%
Celeron 877 242

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i5-3340M 1054
+131%
Celeron 877 457

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i5-3340M 3
+195%
Celeron 877 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.70 0.44
Integrated graphics card 1.18 0.77
Recency 1 January 2013 1 July 2012
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 17 Watt

i5-3340M has a 286.4% higher aggregate performance score, 53.2% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 6 months, 100% more threads, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron 877, on the other hand, has 105.9% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-3340M is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 877 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-3340M and Celeron 877, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-3340M
Core i5-3340M
Intel Celeron 877
Celeron 877

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 176 votes

Rate Core i5-3340M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 17 votes

Rate Celeron 877 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-3340M or Celeron 877, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.